exergy
Send an enquiry →
Case studies / Industrial production
Industrial production · Scope 3 · downstream

Scope 3 with the biggest impact after the product is sold

The Scope 3 analysis showed that processing of sold products can make up about three quarters of the total footprint. That is outside the company’s own operations.

Scope 3 Downstream Processing of products
Client
Manufacturing company
Sector
Industrial production
Scope of work
Corporate footprint, Scopes 1, 2 and 3
Main finding
~75% of the footprint downstream
Where the client started

The client needed a corporate footprint for Scopes 1, 2 and 3. At first, the natural focus was on energy, fuels and the company’s own activity.

Only the full Scope 3 map showed where most emissions are. They are further down the value chain, in what happens to the product after it is sold.

Main challenges
—finding the downstream categories,
—estimating emissions from processing of sold products,
—separating own emissions from value chain emissions,
—choosing factors and assumptions for processes outside the company,
—a result that managers can use.
What the numbers showed

In one of the cases we analysed, processing of sold products made up about 75% of the total corporate carbon footprint.

By comparison, direct emissions and energy together made up less than 20%. Purchased goods and services mattered, but they did not dominate the result.

This is a strong business finding. Even if the company makes its own operations more energy efficient, the biggest potential may lie elsewhere. It may need talks with customers, changes in product design or specifications, or better product information.

Scope of work

How we ran the project

01

Scope 3 mapping

We reviewed the upstream and downstream categories and chose the ones that really apply to the client’s business.

02

Own emissions

We included Scopes 1 and 2 as a point of reference for the total footprint.

03

Downstream categories

We paid special attention to processing of sold products and to downstream transport.

04

Assumptions and factors

For categories outside the client’s direct control, we used documented assumptions and factors.

05

Report and explanation

We presented the result as information for managers. It shows where the biggest impacts are and where work at plant level is not enough.

GHG Protocol Scope 3 downstream categories IPCC AR6 DEFRA / reference databases
Result

The client got a report that shows its main emissions are outside its own operations. This helps it plan better. Action is needed not only on energy efficiency, but also on the product, customers, technical specifications and environmental data in the value chain.

Conclusion

Scope 3 can change the way a company talks about decarbonisation. If about three quarters of the footprint comes after the product is sold, a reduction strategy cannot focus only on the plant.

Where is your company’s carbon footprint really?

Let’s talk. We will measure your full Scope 3 and show which categories decide the result.

Contact us
Facing a similar challenge? Let’s talk.
+48 888 242 547contact@exergy.eco
Fill in the form

We use your details only to reply to your enquiry. More in our privacy policy.